Beyond Subs Subs Subs, the Shuffle Pentagon budget raises questions for the Navy

  • Pentagon’s leadership plans to attract 8%, or $ 50 billion, from various projects to finance Trump’s advantages.
  • Excluded programs include nuclear modernization, missile protection and Virginia class submarines.
  • Memo has caused confusion about its implications for the essential effort of building Navy ships.

A $ $ 50 billion change switch ordered by President Donald Trump’s new Secretary of Defense makes submarines of the attack a priority but raises questions for the rest of the Navy.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth aims to attract approximately 8% of the Biden 2026 fiscal budget from existing programs and to move them to the recently defined advantages of Trump. The plan has led to the confusion what this can say about a critical area needed to face China: building Navy ships.

Only 17 areas of the Pentagon program would be excluded for a memorandum from Hegseth, including “southwestern border activities”, submarines of Virginia class attack and “executable” surface vessels.

Building Navy warships has been seeking for years and requires constant funds for private shipbuilding builders hiring skilled techniques and industrial processes needed to build advanced combat vessels. The directive leaves unclear whether the new administration wants to continue the construction of aircraft carriers, ballistic missile submarines, frigates, amphibious attack ships and other vessels.


An American Navy plane carrier and two destroyers floating in the open ocean.

USS Gerald R. Ford is the first in a new grade of aircraft carriers. President Trump recently criticized the ship in a discussion of government waste.

Photo of the US Navy by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Jacob Mattingly



“The Secretary of Defense is injecting a colossal amount of confusion and combustion and uncertainty in the budgeting process,” told Bryan Mcgrath, a national defense and security adviser and retirement commander, Business Insider told an interview.

The details of the plans were reported this week, and Hegseth publicly said that budget shifts are “focusing” on “high line items” and eliminating “Woke” projects.

For the construction of Navy ships-an industrial effort approximately $ 40 billion every year-Class attack tracks in Virginia are the only bright country. But the Virginia class submarines are facing delays in construction years, along with many other classes of warships that are essential for building a larger and more modern fleet.

Subs and budget attacks

Virginia class submarines were the only Navy ship specially identified as a priority in the memorandum.

The Subs Subs Subs Virginia-Class Pentagon Pentagon has been long seen as a critical ability to oppose China, a US rival with a considerable superficial fleet and long-range missiles that may threaten US ships.

US submarines are difficult to track and are less threatened by Chinese ballistic missiles, Tom Shugart, an elderly associate at the center for a new US and retired Navy submarine official, said in a Call with BI on Thursday.

The memory did not mention plans for the new Subs Columbia-Class, an important part of the process of already developing nuclear modernization.

Ballistic missile signatures, known as SSBN or “boomers”, will hold three -thirds II nuclear heads. These underwater are more difficult to target and destroy compared to inter-continental ballistic missiles based on silo or bombs, helping to maintain US Strike Strike skills.


An A-10 flies over an American Boomer submarine.

A plane with land attacks A-10 flies over a submarine of Ohio class ballistic missile, a boomer submarine that the next columbia-class submarine is expected to replace.

Photo of the US Navy by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Grade Gwendelyn Ohrazda/released



The Columbia class submarines are likely to be included within the category of “Nuclear Modernization”, said Shugart, as they are probably the most important part of nuclear modernization.

For surface boats, only ships identified as “executable surface ships” are free from budget cuts – raising questions about what means “executable”. Numerous Navy shipbuilding programs are destroyed by production delays, such as new constellation class fruits and Ford Trump aircraft carriers recently called in a discussion of waste and fraud. Unsure budgets are a factor that has run ship delays and increased costs.

Ship construction is measured in years. Shipyard workers began construction on the second Ford class carrier in 2015. It is finally planned to join the fleet later this year.

Shugart and McGrath expressed confusion about what could qualify as a “executable surface ship”. The term may include ships such as Arleigh Burke class destroyers, which shipping shipyards are actively producing with strong models and time limits.

It is likely “means surface boats that are built on the industrial base as we have it today,” Shugart said. War vessels as a new class of frigures that are not in hot production lines can be in trouble.

Does not say “superficial warriors;” She says “superficial boat”, Shugart noted. “I’m not sure what this means about aircraft carriers,” he said. “It can also apply to surface aids, such as oil and tanks.”

Marina declined to comment on the Memorandum of Priorities issued by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, which did not respond to Bi’s request on Friday for clarity on what a “executable” ship or confusion caused by memory.


Submarine with rapid attacks of the Virginia USS Mississippi in water near Japan's air base

The submarines of the class attack on Virginia, one of the president’s well -known advantages among the uncertainty in the budget, represent a critical ability for the Navy, but there are a number of skills that make up the sea strength.

US Navy Photo by Electronic Technician First Class Brandon Holland



“Financial” Financial “Financial” The risks of difficult battles with Congress, suggesting that money can come from elsewhere.

McGrath said the planned Pentagon leadership reallocations seem ready to reduce readiness in more common but critical areas of military funds, including reserve money, equipment maintenance and quality of life service; Marina spends $ 14.5 billion a year to store her ships.

This approach can include things such as barracks renovations, improved nutrition and the availability of good care for parents for parents in uniform, all the factors that can affect the morals of the bodies and the levels of retention. Readiness problems can be exacerbated by cuts in the workforce of the Navy of civil experts repairing ships.

“This money will surely be offered to some of it,” Mcgrath said. “Because when you get essential readiness, shipbuilding, submarines and weapons, ammunition, and you say” you can’t cut out of those things “, there is not just a lot of fat there to continue.”

Proposed budget movements are likely to be first reviewed by the office of the Secretary of Defense, noted McGrath, and in some cases can be rehalocated where they came first, making the cutting cut an overwhelming drill for Dilier staff officers in Pentagon.

In general, “is a terrible way to run a rail,” he said.